Why AI Extinction Risk is a Business Reality
At a CEO summit in the hallowed halls of Yale University, 42% of the CEOs indicated that artificial intelligence (AI) could spell the end of humanity within the next decade. These aren’t the leaders of small business: this is 119 CEOs from a cross-section of top companies, including Walmart CEO Doug McMillion, Coca-Cola CEO James Quincy, the leaders of IT companies like Xerox and Zoom as well as CEOs from pharmaceutical, media and manufacturing.
This isn’t a plot from a dystopian novel or a Hollywood blockbuster. It’s a stark warning from the titans of industry who are shaping our future.
The AI Extinction Risk: A Laughing Matter?
It’s easy to dismiss these concerns as the stuff of science fiction. After all, AI is just a tool, right? It’s like a hammer. It can build a house or it can smash a window. It all depends on who’s wielding it. But what if the hammer starts swinging itself?
The findings come just weeks after dozens of AI industry leaders, academics, and even some celebrities signed a statement warning of an “extinction” risk from AI. That statement, signed by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, Geoffrey Hinton, the “godfather of AI,” and top executives from Google and Microsoft, called for society to take steps to guard against the dangers of AI.
“Mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war,” the statement said. This isn’t a call to arms. It’s a call to awareness. It’s a call to responsibility.
It’s Time to Take AI Risk Seriously
The AI revolution is here, and it’s transforming everything from how we shop to how we work. But as we embrace the convenience and efficiency that AI brings, we must also grapple with its potential dangers. We must ask ourselves: Are we ready for a world where AI has the potential to outthink, outperform, and outlast us?
Business leaders have a responsibility to not only drive profits but also safeguard the future. The risk of AI extinction isn’t just a tech issue. It’s a business issue. It’s a human issue. And it’s an issue that requires our immediate attention.
The CEOs who participated in the Yale survey are not alarmists. They are realists. They understand that AI, like any powerful tool, can be both a boon and a bane. And they are calling for a balanced approach to AI—one that embraces its potential while mitigating its risks.
The Tipping Point: AI’s Existential Threat
The existential threat of AI isn’t a distant possibility. It’s a present reality. Every day, AI is becoming more sophisticated, more powerful, and more autonomous. It’s not just about robots taking our jobs. It’s about AI systems making decisions that could have far-reaching implications for our society, our economy, and our planet.
Consider the potential of autonomous weapons, for example. These are AI systems designed to kill without human intervention. What happens if they fall into the wrong hands? Or what about AI systems that control our critical infrastructure? A single malfunction or cyberattack could have catastrophic consequences.
AI represents a paradox. On one hand, it promises unprecedented progress. It could revolutionize healthcare, education, transportation, and countless other sectors. It could solve some of our most pressing problems, from climate change to poverty.
On the other hand, AI poses a peril like no other. It could lead to mass unemployment, social unrest, and even global conflict. And in the worst-case scenario, it could lead to human extinction.
This is the paradox we must confront. We must harness the power of AI while avoiding its pitfalls. We must ensure that AI serves us, not the other way around.
The AI Alignment Problem: Bridging the Gap Between Machine and Human Values
The AI alignment problem, the challenge of ensuring AI systems behave in ways that align with human values, is not just a philosophical conundrum. It’s a potential existential threat. If not addressed properly, it could set us on a path towards self-destruction.
Consider an AI system designed to optimize a certain goal, such as maximizing the production of a particular resource. If this AI is not perfectly aligned with human values, it might pursue its goal at all costs, disregarding any potential negative impacts on humanity. For instance, it might over-exploit resources, leading to environmental devastation, or it might decide that humans themselves are obstacles to its goal and act against us.
This is known as the “instrumental convergence” thesis. Essentially, it suggests that most AI systems, unless explicitly programmed otherwise, will converge on similar strategies to achieve their goals, such as self-preservation, resource acquisition, and resistance to being shut down. If an AI becomes superintelligent, these strategies could pose a serious threat to humanity.
The alignment problem becomes even more concerning when we consider the possibility of an “intelligence explosion“—a scenario in which an AI becomes capable of recursive self-improvement, rapidly surpassing human intelligence. In this case, even a small misalignment between the AI’s values and ours could have catastrophic consequences. If we lose control of such an AI, it could result in human extinction.
Furthermore, the alignment problem is complicated by the diversity and dynamism of human values. Values vary greatly among different individuals, cultures, and societies, and they can change over time. Programming an AI to respect these diverse and evolving values is a monumental challenge.
Addressing the AI alignment problem is therefore crucial for our survival. It requires a multidisciplinary approach, combining insights from computer science, ethics, psychology, sociology, and other fields. It also requires the involvement of diverse stakeholders, including AI developers, policymakers, ethicists, and the public.
As we stand on the brink of the AI revolution, the alignment problem presents us with a stark choice. If we get it right, AI could usher in a new era of prosperity and progress. If we get it wrong, it could lead to our downfall. The stakes couldn’t be higher. Let’s make sure we choose wisely.
The Way Forward: Responsible AI
So, what’s the way forward? How do we navigate this brave new world of AI?
First, we need to foster a culture of responsible AI. This means developing AI in a way that respects our values, our laws, and our safety. It means ensuring that AI systems are transparent, accountable, and fair.
Second, we need to invest in AI safety research. We need to understand the risks of AI and how to mitigate them. We need to develop techniques for controlling AI and for aligning it with our interests.
Third, we need to engage in a global dialogue on AI. We need to involve all stakeholders—governments, businesses, civil society, and the public—in the decision-making process. We need to build a global consensus on the rules and norms for AI.
Conclusion: The Choice is Ours
In the end, the question isn’t whether AI will destroy humanity. The question is: Will we let it?
The time to act is now. Let’s take the risk of AI extinction seriously – as do nearly half of the top business leaders. Because the future of our businesses—and our very existence—may depend on it. We have the power to shape the future of AI. We have the power to turn the tide. But we must act with wisdom, with courage, and with urgency. Because the stakes couldn’t be higher. The AI revolution is upon us. The choice is ours. Let’s make the right one.
Key Take-Away
Urgent need to address AI's potential to endanger humanity through alignment issues and responsible development. Share on X
Image credit: ThisIsEngineering/Pexels
Dr. Gleb Tsipursky was lauded as “Office Whisperer” and “Hybrid Expert” by The New York Times for helping leaders use hybrid work to improve retention and productivity while cutting costs. He serves as the CEO of the boutique future-of-work consultancy Disaster Avoidance Experts. Dr. Gleb wrote the first book on returning to the office and leading hybrid teams after the pandemic, his best-seller Returning to the Office and Leading Hybrid and Remote Teams: A Manual on Benchmarking to Best Practices for Competitive Advantage (Intentional Insights, 2021). He authored seven books in total, and is best know for his global bestseller, Never Go With Your Gut: How Pioneering Leaders Make the Best Decisions and Avoid Business Disasters (Career Press, 2019). His cutting-edge thought leadership was featured in over 650 articles and 550 interviews in Harvard Business Review, Forbes, Inc. Magazine, USA Today, CBS News, Fox News, Time, Business Insider, Fortune, and elsewhere. His writing was translated into Chinese, Korean, German, Russian, Polish, Spanish, French, and other languages. His expertise comes from over 20 years of consulting, coaching, and speaking and training for Fortune 500 companies from Aflac to Xerox. It also comes from over 15 years in academia as a behavioral scientist, with 8 years as a lecturer at UNC-Chapel Hill and 7 years as a professor at Ohio State. A proud Ukrainian American, Dr. Gleb lives in Columbus, Ohio. In his free time, he makes sure to spend abundant quality time with his wife to avoid his personal life turning into a disaster. Contact him at Gleb[at]DisasterAvoidanceExperts[dot]com, follow him on LinkedIn @dr-gleb-tsipursky, Twitter @gleb_tsipursky, Instagram @dr_gleb_tsipursky, Facebook @DrGlebTsipursky, Medium @dr_gleb_tsipursky, YouTube, and RSS, and get a free copy of the Assessment on Dangerous Judgment Errors in the Workplace by signing up for the free Wise Decision Maker Course at https://disasteravoidanceexperts.com/newsletter/.