A Reckless Erosion of Trust

4 min read
Erosion of Trust

President Trump has embarked on an unprecedented experiment in executive overreach that is destroying the balance of powers and long-standing institutional commitments that have defined American democracy. This second term marks a dramatic departure from established norms, as sweeping policy shifts challenge the very foundations of our political system. Abandoned commitments to federal employees, sudden international withdrawals, and drastic funding freezes all point to a deliberate effort to consolidate power. Such actions are not mere policy adjustments; they constitute a fundamental assault on the constitutional principles that have long guided the nation, while undermining democratic stability. 

A central indicator of this troubling shift is the administration’s decision to freeze funding for nearly 2,600 federal programs. Moreover, it’s using DOGE as a para-governmental organization to impose unilateral cuts of programs it doesn’t like, despite such funds already being approved by legislative action. By withholding funds that Congress has appropriated, the executive branch sidesteps its constitutional limits and undermines legislative authority. This maneuver not only violates established fiscal controls and creates a constitutional crisis. It also sets a dangerous precedent, allowing future administrations to bypass democratic oversight in favor of unchecked power and poses a significant threat to our very republic.

Another major policy shift is the imposition of a comprehensive federal hiring freeze and deferred resignation offer for most federal employees. Marketed as a measure to cut government spending and eliminate inefficiencies, this policy is widely seen as a tactic to weaken the nonpartisan civil service. By forcing long-serving and experienced employees to leave, the administration risks depleting the institutional memory and expertise necessary for effective governance. Undermining merit-based hiring practices will lead to lasting damage in key areas such as healthcare, environmental protection, education, and public safety, ultimately reducing the quality of services that citizens rely upon daily with severe consequences.

In a striking departure from traditional environmental policy, President Trump has rolled back decades of climate initiatives. Within hours of assuming office, executive orders were issued to promote fossil fuel production and expedite exploration in ecologically sensitive areas, including national wildlife refuges. The administration’s aggressive stance not only undermines efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but it also jeopardizes public health programs reliant on strict environmental standards. By dismissing international climate agreements and prioritizing short-term energy gains over long-term sustainability, these measures reflect an alarming shift toward policies that favor industry interests over environmental protection, thereby endangering our future generations.

Internationally, the administration has sharply retreated from global cooperation. Embracing an “America First” approach, it issued orders to withdraw from key organizations, including the World Health Organization. It suspended foreign development assistance for at least ninety days and is trying to shut down USAID. This move signals a willingness to abandon long-standing international commitments in favor of narrow national interests. Such actions will undermine global health security and diminish the United States’ influence on the world stage. The decision to forsake multilateral engagement raises serious concerns about America’s future role as a leader in addressing transnational challenges, thereby imperiling international long-term global stability and sustained cooperation.

The actions of DOGE, particularly its access to sensitive Treasury Department data, highlight significant risks to trust in the U.S. financial system. Experts, including former Treasury secretaries, warn that the mishandling of Treasury systems could erode confidence in U.S. financial management and harm the dollar’s standing as the world’s reserve currency. Furthermore, privacy advocates view DOGE’s actions as a dangerous centralization of power that compromises Americans’ personal data security, potentially resulting in identity theft or other abuses. These developments, coupled with rhetoric dismissing traditional safeguards as inefficiencies, contribute to a broader erosion of trust in government institutions.

The cumulative impact of these executive actions has been a steady erosion of public trust in government. Americans have long depended on a system of checks and balances that prevents any single branch from accumulating too much power. Yet as the executive branch repeatedly bypasses legislative oversight—through funding freezes, hiring bans, and international disengagement—the foundation of trust is crumbling. Each unilateral move reinforces a growing perception that decisions are made for ideological rather than public benefit. This erosion of trust fuels disillusionment and deepens political polarization, undermining the legitimacy of all governmental institutions, thus endangering our nation’s democratic future.

A fierce legal backlash has emerged in response to these actions. States, advocacy groups, and federal employees have challenged the executive branch’s authority to impound funds and impose hiring freezes without congressional approval. Federal judges have issued injunctions against some of these measures, reasserting the judiciary’s role as a check on unchecked executive power. Although these legal battles are in their early stages, they represent a significant pushback against the erosion of constitutional norms. This legal resistance is a crucial element in the fight to restore balance and preserve democratic governance in America, offering renewed, steadfast hope for institutional renewal.

Unfortunately, in another example of the reckless erosion of trust, rhetoric from administration officials and allies, including Vice President JD Vance and Elon Musk, undermines the principle of judicial independence. Vance asserted that “judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” suggesting that judicial oversight of executive actions is inappropriate. Musk went further, labeling a federal judge as “a corrupt judge protecting corruption” and calling for immediate impeachment. Such rhetoric challenges the foundational principle of checks and balances inherent in the U.S. Constitution. By undermining the judiciary’s role as a co-equal branch of government, these remarks risk diminishing public confidence in the impartiality and authority of the courts, contributing to a constitutional crisis.

Beyond legal challenges, the symbolic impact of these actions is profound. For decades, American society has been built on the promise of stable, cooperative governance and adherence to democratic norms. The systematic dismantling of civil rights, international commitments, and fair administrative practices signals a betrayal of that promise. As citizens witness the weakening of long-established institutions, a sense of disillusionment and despair is inevitable. This symbolic rupture not only undermines faith in government but also erodes the collective social contract that binds the nation together in pursuit of common ideals and shared prosperity, fostering a renewed commitment to democratic renewal.

The international consequences of this internal upheaval are significant. The United States, once a global exemplar of democratic governance, now risks losing its leadership role on critical issues such as climate change and global health. As the country retreats from multilateral agreements and international organizations, China and other rival powers will seize the opportunity to challenge its influence. This shift not only undermines global cooperation but also diminishes America’s soft power in addressing transnational challenges. The erosion of trust within at home reverberates abroad, threatening the stability of the international order and weakening collective efforts to tackle shared problems and endangers future global unity.

President Trump’s combination of funding freezes, hiring bans, environmental rollbacks, and international withdrawals reflects a deliberate effort to concentrate power and undermine democratic norms. These policies not only threaten critical public services and international cooperation, but they also erode the essential trust between government and citizens. The long-term consequences of this executive overreach may well redefine the future of American democracy, making it imperative for all who value freedom and accountability to stand united in defense of constitutional principles, ensuring the survival of our republic.

Key Take-Away

The erosion of trust in democratic institutions is accelerating as executive overreach undermines checks and balances. Funding freezes, hiring bans, and international withdrawals weaken governance, fueling public disillusionment and threatening… Share on X

Image credit: Thuan Vo/pexels


Dr. Gleb Tsipursky was named “Office Whisperer” by The New York Times for helping leaders overcome frustrations with hybrid work and Generative AI. He serves as the CEO of the future-of-work consultancy Disaster Avoidance Experts. Dr. Gleb wrote seven best-selling books, and his two most recent ones are Returning to the Office and Leading Hybrid and Remote Teams and ChatGPT for Thought Leaders and Content Creators: Unlocking the Potential of Generative AI for Innovative and Effective Content Creation. His cutting-edge thought leadership was featured in over 650 articles and 550 interviews in Harvard Business Review, Inc. Magazine, USA Today, CBS News, Fox News, Time, Business Insider, Fortune, The New York Times, and elsewhere. His writing was translated into Chinese, Spanish, Russian, Polish, Korean, French, Vietnamese, German, and other languages. His expertise comes from over 20 years of consulting, coaching, and speaking and training for Fortune 500 companies from Aflac to Xerox. It also comes from over 15 years in academia as a behavioral scientist, with 8 years as a lecturer at UNC-Chapel Hill and 7 years as a professor at Ohio State. A proud Ukrainian American, Dr. Gleb lives in Columbus, Ohio.