Wise Decision Making
22 Million Reasons to Accommodate Work-From-Home Requests
The $22.1 million verdict in Billesdon v. Wells Fargo highlights the legal risks of ignoring work-from-home requests under the ADA. Employers must engage in the interactive process, assess requests fairly, and avoid legal pitfalls by adhering to ADA requirements.
Read MoreThe Dangers of Losing Executives Due to RTO Mandates
RTO mandates are driving a significant leadership exodus, with one-third of executives ready to leave over forced in-office policies. This misalignment threatens organizational stability, requiring flexible work options to retain top talent and ensure long-term success.
Read MoreWill Gen AI Disrupt Your Association or Propel It to New Heights?
To navigate Gen AI disrupt challenges, association leaders must address resistance, invest in education, ensure data security, and maintain human oversight. This balances AI’s potential to enhance operations while preserving trust, ethics, and member relationships.
Read MoreCongress’s Push Against Remote Work Misfires
The pressure against remote work in the federal government is unwarranted. The OMB report shows federal agencies are exceeding in-office expectations, balancing telework with mission needs. Telework enhances employee engagement and productivity, making it a strategic asset.
Read MoreJoni Ernst’s War on Remote Work Ignores the Data—Here It Is
The war on remote work led by Senator Ernst and DOGE ignores data showing telework boosts productivity, retention, and cost savings. Federal reports debunk her claims, proving hybrid models modernize operations without sacrificing accountability.
Read MoreTo Beat China, Washington Needs Facts, Not Myths, About Telework
Myths about telework in the federal government are misleading. Data shows only 22% of federal employees telework regularly, aligning with private-sector trends. Embracing telework can boost efficiency, save costs, and enhance U.S. competitiveness against China.
Read MoreAmerica Can’t Afford Trump’s War on Remote Work
The Trump administration’s “War on Remote Work” aims to shrink the federal workforce by forcing employees back to the office. This risks inefficiency, skill shortages, and higher costs, suggesting that targeted reforms and remote work should be prioritized for better efficiency.
Read MoreThe Danger of “Quit and Staying” Due to RTO Mandates
RTO mandates risk increasing “quiet quitting,” as employees disengage when forced back to the office. Offering flexible work options boosts engagement and satisfaction, helping organizations thrive.
Read MoreManagers Want You Back in the Office—Because They’re Not Ready for Hybrid
A lack of training for hybrid work, with only 10% of managers receiving mandatory instruction, hampers productivity and engagement, leading to a push for back in the office.
Read MoreWill Remote Work Determine the Election?
The surge in remote work has fueled migration from Democratic urban centers to more affordable suburban and rural areas, often in Republican or swing states, potentially shifting voter demographics and influencing close races in battleground states for the 2024 election.
Read More